City of Hamilton “Dropped The Velodrome Ball”

It’s that time of year again when our thoughts turn to reflection as we think about the events of the last year and wonder: Where did the time go?

Last year at this time there was hope for change and excitement about the future.

Decisions around the Pan Am Games were still to be made. The velodrome appeared as the exciting opportunity that would differentiate Hamilton among the many southern Ontario cities and towns struggling for social-economic survival. Unfortunately it was a vision Hamilton council did not share when it voted to limit our contribution to construction costs at $5 million and not enough to bridge the funding gap.

As one of the many philosophical supporters of the velodrome, I’ve written several times about the importance of the velodrome in establishing Hamilton as a cycling destination — and not just for those who cycle in circles around a track. Our beautiful escarpment landscape, from Niagara Falls through the wine country and along the shores of two great lakes, is ideally suited for distance training and recreational cycling. It’s not just the velodrome, but the velodrome being at the heart of it all. I can see that being a hard sell to a society stuck in their cars.

When I received an email from the Hamilton Velodrome Pledge Drive I put my money where my mouth is and pledged my financial support. Sadly, I was not the one to win the $50-million lottery jackpot this past weekend, but know if I did I’d happily be the Secret Santa for the Hamilton velodrome project.

Recent reports in The Spectator, however, have indicated that there is someone, or some people, in the community who share the velodrome vision. Sources have pointed to a silent investor whose contribution could solve the funding dilemma and serve as an anchor to attract further investment. If only it were true.

When the Pan Am bid was submitted in international competition, Hamilton was the preferred location for the Pan Am velodrome, and indeed, Hamilton seemed the logical location, given our successful history with the 2003 World Road Cycling Championships. It was ours to lose.

What happened? How did we lose so much potential promise? What happened to our vision? Did we even have any to begin with? What do we see when we look around the city we live in? Are we so blinded by our “depression,” by our poor-cousin status, by our socio-economic struggles, to even entertain the thought that a project like the velodrome could be a success here in Hamilton? Who wants to come to Hamilton, people say among themselves. Even people who live here wish they lived someplace else. Maybe they’d rather go to Milton.

Just take a look at their website. Milton bills itself as one of the fastest-growing communities in North America. Vibrant, energetic, colourful, helpful. A velodrome in Milton would be a wonderful addition to their community.

Now take a look at Hamilton’s website. The initial presentation is flat with little imagination. You have to dig a little deeper to find any creativity or colour. Where would you put your money or locate your family? Which community do you think has a stronger self-image, or presents itself more positively? Why does Milton think they can carry it off and we don’t?

This is about more than just the velodrome. Hamilton bills itself as a city of innovators but that may be just wishful thinking. The debacle of the Pan Am Games puts the lie to that claim. What did we end up with? The same old same old.

The velodrome is now Milton’s to lose. I doubt they’ll let it go so easily.

Margaret Shkimba is a freelance writer who lives in Hamilton. She can be reached at menrvasofia@gmail.com or you can “Friend” her on Facebook.